Home » Advocacy » Accountability Home » Advocacy » ESEA Home » Advocacy » No Child Left Behind Home » Advocacy » Teacher Effectiveness Home » Advocacy » Teacher Quality

Civil Rights Groups, Business Groups, State Education Officials, and Education Advocates on ESEA Proposal: "We Cannot Support the Bill at this Time"

Civil Rights Groups, Business Groups, State Education Officials, and Education Advocates on ESEA Proposal: "We Cannot Support the Bill at this Time"
 
Groups Stress Federal Accountability
 
Read the joint statement below (or click here for a PDF)
 
Click here and here to read previous coalition letters on accountability and teacher quality and effectiveness.
 
"As representatives of the millions of students with disabilities, low-income students, students of color, English-language learners and migrant students who are studying in our nation's schools, both boys and girls, we cannot support the Elementary and Secondary Education Reauthorization Act of 2011 at this time. The bill's weak accountability system excludes the vast majority of children we represent, and is a major barrier to our organizations' support.
 
We applaud the inclusion of much-needed reforms on college and career ready standards and assessments; accountability for dropout factories, more equitable funding within districts, a focus on access to high-level STEM courses for underrepresented groups, and improvements in limiting alternate assessments for students with disabilities and recognize the benefits that these provisions could yield for students.
 
In its current form, however, states would not have to set any measurable achievement and progress targets or even graduation rate goals. They would be required to take action to improve only a small number of low-performing schools. In schools which aren't among the states' very worst performing, huge numbers of low-achieving students will slip through the cracks.
 
Federal funding must be attached to firm, ambitious and unequivocal demands for higher achievement, high school graduation rates and gap closing. We know that states, school districts, and schools needed a more modern and focused law. However, we respectfully believe that the bill goes too far in providing flexibility by marginalizing the focus on the achievement of disadvantaged students.
 
Although we are unable to support the legislation in its current form, we hope to work with Chairman Harkin and Ranking Member Enzi to address our concerns as the process moves forward."
 
The following groups signed the letter:
 
American Civil Liberties Union
Business Coalition for Student Achievement 
Chiefs for Change
Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. 
Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund 
Democrats for Education Reform
The Education Trust
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights* 
League of United Latin American Citizens 
MALDEF (the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund) 
NAACP
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
National Center for Learning Disabilities
National Council of La Raza
National Down Syndrome Society
National Urban League        
National Women's Law Center
The New Teachers Project
Poverty & Race Research Action Council
Southeast Asia Research and Action Center
U.S. Chamber of Commerce